Resumo:
This dissertation is the result of research about the history, proposal and practice of the
Pastoral Popular Urbana PPU [Popular Urban Ministry] organized on the periphery of the
Caxias do Sul Diocese in 1984, but with initial roots in 1969. The research utilized was
bibliographic, documental, field diaries, social research and personal experience. Its goal was
to analyze the contributions of the PPU when it opted for the work world and for the worker s
class, in the process of industrialization and urbanization, as well as the roots of its
disenchantment, verifying the motives for this proposal not creating roots, in spite of it being
a concrete church project. The birth process of a church concerned with the people and with
the social-political problems, in the mid 1960s, is a result of a process which initially
fructified through the initiative of the grassroots leadership, mainly the specialized Catholic
Action, aware of the reality of the Latin American dependence and domination. The research
does an analysis of the different ways in which the Popular Church influenced the goals, the
methodology, the theology and ecclesiology of the PPU on the periphery of the cities of the
Caxias do Sul Diocese. In this period the military dictatorships in Latin America were
becoming increasingly violent against the population and the leaders of the liberation
movement. In all of Brazil the military repression had deep implications in the liberation
process. The union, student and popular movements were practically decimated and the
political parties were closed. Any popular reaction was severely persecuted. The reaction to
the dictatorship began to gain space through the reorganization of the popular, union and
student movements and of the Christian Base Communities and the Centers for Human Rights
in the struggle for amnesty and for democracy. The Catholic Church went from unconditional
support to questioning the repressive practices used by the dictatorships. This time is
characterized by great theoretical and practical creativity, and by the commitment of sectors
of Christian churches to the process of Latin American liberation. In this scenario a more
popular church sprouts forth which happens through the practice of the popular ministry. To
consider this social and ecclesial effervescence is a condition for analyzing the proposal of the
PPU as the fruit of a long period of accompaniment, participation and analysis of the
transformations which were occurring in the world, more specifically in Latin America. In the
memory of the history of the PPU, one recovers persons, practices, methodologies and a
proposal of evangelization committed to the structural transformations of society, such as
historical mediations of the kingdom of God, which have as sources the II Vatican Council,
Theology of Liberation, the Popular Church, the Liberation Movement and the option for the
poor. With the political opening and the process of democratization, at the end of the decade
of 1980, one perceives a process of fatigue and depletion of the PPU practice, signaling a
phase of transition which demands a review of the orientations and practices which were
useful before but at this historical moment are not able to deal with the new complexity.